Webb5 nov. 2024 · The Supreme Court has recently handed down a judgment (Shanks (Appellant) v Unilever Plc and others (Respondents) [2024] UKSC 45) clarifying when (and how much) compensation is owed to employee inventors under s40 (1) Patents Act 1977. Read the full judgement Shanks (Appellant) v Unilever Plc and others (Respondents)) … WebbShanks v Unilever – Supreme Court Concludes an “Outstanding” Legal Saga on Employee Inventions On 23 October 2024, Kitchin LJ handed down a judgment, available here, …
Shanks v Unilever: UK Supreme Court awards £2m to patent inventor
Webb23 okt. 2024 · Professor Shanks claimed against Unilever for employee compensation under the Patents Act 1977, which at the relevant time gave employees a right to claim compensation for a patent that was of... Webb6 nov. 2024 · The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its judgment in the long-running employee compensation case of Shanks v Unilever Plc.The claim was brought under s.40 of the Patents Act 1977 by an inventor seeking a share of the benefit gained by his employer, a division of Unilever, on the basis that the patents resulting from his invention … theory of nonuniform rc lines
Compensation for employee inventions: why the ... - Practical Law
Webb23 okt. 2024 · Shanks v Unilever Plc and Others. Judgment Weekly Law Reports Business law reports The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 19 Cited in 4 ... Jurisdiction: … Webb14 nov. 2024 · Professor Shanks was awarded £2m. The Supreme Court’s decision provides welcome clarity on the question of what constitutes an “outstanding benefit” and potentially lowers the bar to succeed in a claim for compensation, avoiding the risk that large, profitable businesses such as Unilever’s will simply be regarded as ‘too big to pay’. WebbKey recent developments in the United Kingdom and Europe relating to patents and the pharmaceutical sector. In this issue we report on the Supreme Court decision of Shanks … theory of normal backwardation